Wikimedia Foundation
When you use Wikipedia, you’re relying on the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization that operates Wikipedia and its sister projects. Also known as WMF, it doesn’t write articles — it keeps the servers running, pays for legal defense, and supports tools that help volunteers edit safely and efficiently. The Foundation’s job is simple in theory: make sure free knowledge stays online, accessible, and free from censorship. But behind that simplicity are complex decisions about money, power, and who gets to shape what the world knows.
The Wikimedia Enterprise, a commercial service launched to sell Wikipedia data to big companies, is one of the biggest shifts in its history. It brings in millions, but many volunteers worry it creates a two-tier system — where corporations get fast, paid access while editors still struggle with outdated tools. Then there’s Wikidata, a structured database that connects facts across all language versions of Wikipedia. It’s the quiet engine that lets you search for a scientist in English and see their birthplace in Hindi, Arabic, or Swahili — all updated in one place. Without Wikidata, Wikipedia would be a collection of isolated pages, not a global knowledge graph.
And then there are the people. The Wikimedia Foundation doesn’t employ most of the editors who fix typos, fight vandalism, or write deep articles on climate science or Indigenous history. Those are volunteers — tens of thousands of them — working in their spare time, often under pressure from harassment, burnout, or legal threats. The Foundation tries to protect them with safety policies and legal aid, but the gap between its resources and the scale of the problem keeps growing. When a journalist uses Wikipedia to fact-check a story, or a student in a rural town finds their hometown’s history documented for the first time, they’re benefiting from a system built by unpaid people, supported by a non-profit that’s always one funding cycle away from hard choices.
What you’ll find in the posts below isn’t just news about the Foundation — it’s the real-world ripple effects of its decisions. From how copyright takedowns erase local history, to how AI tools are changing editing workflows, to how volunteers are fighting bias in coverage of Indigenous communities — every story ties back to who holds power, who gets heard, and what happens when free knowledge meets corporate interests, political pressure, and human limits. This isn’t about corporate press releases. It’s about what happens when a global encyclopedia is run by volunteers, funded by donations, and watched by billions.
Safety and Integrity Investments: Protecting Wikipedians
Wikipedia relies on volunteers who face real threats for editing controversial topics. The Wikimedia Foundation is investing in safety tools, legal aid, and anonymity features to protect these editors and preserve the integrity of free knowledge.
How the Wikimedia Foundation Is Meeting Its Hiring and Diversity Goals
The Wikimedia Foundation is transforming its hiring practices to build a diverse, globally representative team that reflects Wikipedia’s worldwide users - with measurable results and real impact on content.
How Wikimedia Grants Shape Wikipedia Community Projects
Wikimedia grants empower local communities to build and expand Wikipedia content in underrepresented languages and regions, driving real change in global knowledge access.
Wikimedia Foundation's AI Literacy and Policy Advocacy
The Wikimedia Foundation is fighting to ensure AI learns from open knowledge responsibly. Their AI literacy programs and policy advocacy aim to protect Wikipedia’s integrity and demand transparency from AI companies using public data.
Wikimedia Foundation's Tech Team: Infrastructure and Development
The Wikimedia Foundation's tech team maintains Wikipedia's massive infrastructure using open-source tools, volunteer contributions, and a philosophy of stability over speed - all without ads or corporate funding.
How the Wikimedia Foundation Manages Press Coverage and Media Relations
The Wikimedia Foundation doesn't rely on ads or hype to build trust - it uses transparent, journalist-focused media relations to ensure accurate coverage of Wikipedia. Here's how they handle press, criticism, and AI challenges.
WMF Annual Plan 2025-2026: Key Priorities for Wikipedia and Its Global Community
The WMF Annual Plan 2025-2026 outlines how Wikipedia will expand access, fight misinformation, and empower underrepresented editors worldwide. It’s not just about tech-it’s about who gets to write history.
The Sister Projects Task Force: Reviewing Wikimedia Projects
The Sister Projects Task Force is reviewing Wikimedia's 11 open knowledge projects beyond Wikipedia - from Wiktionary to Wikivoyage - to ensure they remain viable, updated, and accessible to global users.
