Tag: Wikipedia reliable sources
Why Press Releases and Corporate Blogs Fail as Wikipedia Sources
Discover why press releases and corporate blogs fail as Wikipedia sources. Learn the rules of editorial independence and how to find reliable, independent citations for your edits.
Academic vs Journalistic Sources on Wikipedia: Standards Compared
Explore the key differences between academic and journalistic sources on Wikipedia. Learn how peer review, timeliness, and bias affect reliability standards and how to choose the right citations for accurate, neutral content.
Wikipedia Verifiability Policy: What Counts as a Reliable Source and Why
Wikipedia's verifiability policy ensures every claim is backed by reliable, published sources. Learn what counts as credible-like peer-reviewed journals and major newspapers-and why personal blogs, social media, and self-published content are rejected.
How Reliable Sources Noticeboard on Wikipedia Works: A Guide to Source Discussions
The Reliable Sources Noticeboard on Wikipedia helps editors decide which sources are trustworthy for articles. It’s not about opinions - it’s about policy, evidence, and consistent standards. Learn how discussions work and what makes a source acceptable.
Perennial Reliable Sources List on Wikipedia: What to Know
Wikipedia relies on a core set of perennial reliable sources like The New York Times, The Lancet, and Reuters. Learn what makes a source trustworthy, why some are rejected, and how to evaluate information beyond Wikipedia.
