Archive: 2026/03 - Page 10
Translating Citations Across Wikipedia Languages: Formatting Tips
Translating citations between Wikipedia language editions requires more than word-for-word translation. You need to adapt the citation format to match each version's template rules. Learn how to restructure parameters, use the right templates, and avoid common errors that break verifiability.
How The Signpost Handles Corrections and Retractions About Wikipedia News
The Signpost, Wikipedia’s community-run newspaper, handles corrections and retractions with transparency and accountability. By publicly labeling errors, preserving original content, and explaining mistakes, it sets a rare standard for journalistic integrity in online communities.
Student Safety on Wikipedia: Managing On-Wiki Interactions
Student editors on Wikipedia often face hostile feedback that can discourage participation. This guide explains why it happens, how to stay safe, and what schools and Wikipedia can do to make editing a positive experience.
Wikipedia Verifiability Policy: What Counts as a Reliable Source and Why
Wikipedia's verifiability policy ensures every claim is backed by reliable, published sources. Learn what counts as credible-like peer-reviewed journals and major newspapers-and why personal blogs, social media, and self-published content are rejected.
Sports Transfer and Draft Days: Why Wikipedia Traffic Spikes on Big Move Days
On sports transfer and draft days, Wikipedia sees massive traffic spikes as fans seek verified player histories. Unlike news sites, it offers deep, permanent records of trades and draft picks - updated by volunteers, not journalists.
Notability Thresholds for Incidents on Wikipedia: When to Create
Wikipedia doesn't create pages for every breaking news event. Learn the real thresholds for when an incident deserves its own article-and why most don't make the cut.
AI Tools for Source Discovery: Helping Wikipedia Editors Find Reliable References
AI tools are helping Wikipedia editors find reliable sources faster and more accurately, reducing edit reverts and improving content quality. These tools match claims to peer-reviewed studies, official reports, and trusted news outlets - without replacing human judgment.
Academic Integrity and Wikipedia: How to Use Wikipedia Without Plagiarism
Wikipedia is a powerful tool for understanding topics, but citing it in academic work leads to plagiarism. Learn how to use it as a starting point-not a source-and find credible references to back up your research with confidence.
Mass Deletion Debates on Wikipedia: Lessons From Notability Wars
Mass deletion debates on Wikipedia reveal how notability rules silently erase marginalized voices. Who gets remembered-and who gets deleted-depends not on importance, but on who’s editing the page.
Feature Journalism vs Wikipedia Backgrounders: Depth, Style, and Purpose
Feature journalism and Wikipedia backgrounders both inform, but one moves you with story, the other grounds you with facts. Understanding their differences helps you use each wisely.
Verifiability Tags on Wikipedia: How to Read and Use Maintenance Templates
Verifiability tags on Wikipedia are essential for maintaining content quality. They flag claims without reliable sources and help readers and editors ensure accuracy. Learn how to interpret and fix these maintenance templates to support trustworthy information.
How Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee Makes Final Editorial Decisions
Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee handles the most serious editing disputes, making final, binding decisions based on community policies. Composed of elected volunteers, it enforces sanctions like topic bans and blocks when community mediation fails.
