Tag: reliable sources - Page 2
How to Handle Retractions and Corrections in Wikipedia References
Wikipedia relies on reliable sources, but when those sources are retracted or corrected, the article must change. Learn how to identify, document, and replace faulty citations to maintain trust and accuracy.
Translating Citations Across Wikipedia Languages: Formatting Tips
Translating citations between Wikipedia language editions requires more than word-for-word translation. You need to adapt the citation format to match each version's template rules. Learn how to restructure parameters, use the right templates, and avoid common errors that break verifiability.
AI Tools for Source Discovery: Helping Wikipedia Editors Find Reliable References
AI tools are helping Wikipedia editors find reliable sources faster and more accurately, reducing edit reverts and improving content quality. These tools match claims to peer-reviewed studies, official reports, and trusted news outlets - without replacing human judgment.
Verifiability Tags on Wikipedia: How to Read and Use Maintenance Templates
Verifiability tags on Wikipedia are essential for maintaining content quality. They flag claims without reliable sources and help readers and editors ensure accuracy. Learn how to interpret and fix these maintenance templates to support trustworthy information.
Source Misuse on Wikipedia: Common Errors and How to Fix Them
Source misuse on Wikipedia is a common problem that undermines accuracy. Learn the top errors editors make with citations and how to fix them using reliable, peer-reviewed, and independent sources.
Evaluating Think Tanks and Advocacy Groups as Wikipedia Sources
Think tanks and advocacy groups are common sources on Wikipedia, but they often carry bias. Learn how to evaluate them properly to maintain neutrality and avoid presenting opinion as fact.
Why Opinion Columns Are Not Reliable Sources for Wikipedia Articles
Wikipedia relies on verifiable facts, not opinions. Opinion columns, even from respected journalists, are not reliable sources because they express personal views instead of documented evidence. Learn why editorials, columns, and commentary are excluded from Wikipedia citations - and what sources to use instead.
How to Evaluate Source Reliability for Wikipedia Citations
Learn how to evaluate source reliability for Wikipedia citations by checking publication status, independence, and verifiability. Avoid blogs and press releases-use peer-reviewed journals, major newspapers, and official reports instead.
Evidence and Diffs: How to Present Your Case in Wikipedia Disputes
Winning Wikipedia disputes isn't about being loud-it's about using verifiable evidence and clear diffs to support your edits. Learn how to cite reliable sources, respond calmly, and use Wikipedia's tools to resolve conflicts effectively.
WikiProject Science: Guide to Improving Scientific Article Accuracy
This guide explains practical steps for Wikipedia editors to enhance scientific accuracy in articles. Learn how to evaluate sources, collaborate with experts, and avoid common pitfalls. Ensuring reliable information helps combat misinformation and supports public understanding of science.
Wikipedia BLP Disputes: Understanding and Resolving Biography Conflicts
Explaining Wikipedia's Biographies of Living Persons policy conflicts and resolution steps. Learn common issues, dispute resolution methods, and real-world examples to ensure accurate and fair biographies.
Using Wikidata to Standardize Sources on Wikipedia
Wikidata helps standardize citations on Wikipedia by storing source details in a central database, making citations consistent, verifiable, and automatically updatable across all articles.
