Wikipedia News Desk - Page 20
How Wikidata Policies Interact with Wikipedia Editorial Standards
Wikidata and Wikipedia share data but follow different rules. Wikidata prioritizes machine-readable consistency; Wikipedia demands human-verified sources. When they clash, editors must navigate conflicting standards to keep information accurate and trustworthy.
How to Evaluate Think Tanks and Advocacy Groups as Sources on Wikipedia
Learn how to evaluate think tanks and advocacy groups as sources on Wikipedia. Discover red flags, verification methods, and when these sources are acceptable-or not.
Why Wikipedia Avoids Top-Down Editorial Control Despite Global Scale
Wikipedia thrives without top-down control by relying on community norms, transparent processes, and open collaboration. Millions of edits daily are guided by policy, not authority - making it one of the most resilient knowledge systems ever built.
How Tourism Seasons Shape Wikipedia Destination Pages
Wikipedia destination pages reflect real-world tourism seasons through edits, updates, and user contributions. Learn how travel patterns shape content - and how you can help make them more accurate.
Managing Conflicts of Interest When Academics Edit Wikipedia
Academics often want to improve Wikipedia articles about their research, but editing directly creates conflicts of interest. Learn how to contribute ethically without violating Wikipedia's policies or undermining public trust.
How Wikipedia Policies Exclude Oral Traditions and Local Knowledge
Wikipedia's reliance on written sources excludes oral traditions and local knowledge, silencing cultures that don't fit its rigid verification standards. This isn't neutrality-it's systemic bias.
How Wikipedia Talk Pages Shape Articles Before You Ever Read Them
Wikipedia articles aren't written in isolation-they're shaped by hidden debates on talk pages. Learn how these behind-the-scenes discussions ensure accuracy, resolve disputes, and make Wikipedia more reliable than you think.
Edit Conflict Resolution: How Wikipedia Handles Competing Changes
Wikipedia resolves edit conflicts by showing users competing changes side by side, forcing manual merging to preserve accuracy. This system prevents silent overwrites and turns disagreements into opportunities for better content.
Ethics of Editing Wikipedia as Part of Academic Coursework
Students editing Wikipedia for class must follow strict ethical rules to avoid plagiarism, bias, and misinformation. Learn how to contribute responsibly with reliable sources and neutral language.
How Wikipedia's Edit Histories Work: Tracking Changes and Revisions
Wikipedia's edit history tracks every change made to articles, allowing users to see who edited what, when, and why. This transparency helps maintain accuracy, fight misinformation, and support collaborative knowledge-building.
How Mentorship and Coaching Programs Boost Wikipedia Editor Retention
Mentorship and coaching programs on Wikipedia significantly improve editor retention by offering personal support, reducing feelings of isolation, and helping newcomers navigate complex community norms. Data shows those with guidance are far more likely to stay and become leaders.
Film Release Week on Wikipedia: Pageviews and Edits
During film release week, Wikipedia pages see massive spikes in views and edits, turning them into real-time cultural archives. Learn how page traffic and community edits reveal what audiences truly care about.
