Category: Online Encyclopedias - Page 6
WMF Grants Strategy for 2025: How Wikipedia Contributors Can Get Funding
The WMF's 2025 grant strategy opens direct funding to individual Wikipedia contributors, helping them cover research, tools, and internet costs. No big projects needed - just consistent, quality editing.
Wikipedia Birthday 2025 Celebrations and Community Activities
Wikipedia turned 24 in 2025 with global celebrations led by volunteers who edited, translated, and preserved knowledge. From Tokyo to Nairobi, communities came together to update underrepresented histories and expand access in local languages.
Bias Mitigation: How Wikipedia’s Diversity Efforts Are Shaping Fairer AI
Wikipedia's uneven representation of women, people of color, and non-Western cultures is shaping biased AI. But volunteer efforts to expand diversity on Wikipedia are already making AI fairer-and anyone can help.
Women in STEM WikiProjects: Fixing the Content Gaps
WikiProjects are fixing major content gaps on Wikipedia by expanding articles about women in STEM. Through deep research, training, and partnerships, volunteers are adding citations, correcting historical erasure, and making science more inclusive for everyone.
Policy Literacy for New Wikipedians: Avoiding Common Mistakes
New Wikipedia editors often make avoidable mistakes by ignoring policies like neutrality, sourcing, and notability. Learn the top five errors and how to fix them to become a trusted contributor.
Recent Changes Patrol Tools on Wikipedia Explained
Recent Changes Patrol tools help volunteers review Wikipedia edits in real time, catching vandalism and improving accuracy. These tools let anyone with an account contribute to keeping Wikipedia reliable - no expertise needed.
A/B Testing Fundraising Banners on Wikipedia: Ethics and Outcomes
Wikipedia relies on A/B-tested fundraising banners to stay ad-free and nonprofit. But as donation rates rise, ethical questions grow: Is manipulating emotions for donations worth the cost to user trust?
Source Misuse on Wikipedia: Common Errors and How to Fix Them
Source misuse on Wikipedia is a common problem that undermines accuracy. Learn the top errors editors make with citations and how to fix them using reliable, peer-reviewed, and independent sources.
How Wikipedia Handles Rumors and Unconfirmed Reports During Crises
Wikipedia handles rumors during crises by relying on verified sources, protecting sensitive pages, and using community-driven fact-checking. It doesn't rush to publish-only confirms what trusted outlets report. This method makes it one of the most reliable sources in chaotic moments.
Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives at Wikimedia Foundation
The Wikimedia Foundation is expanding diversity in Wikipedia's editor base through grants, safer editing tools, and support for underrepresented languages. Progress is measurable, but challenges remain in sustainability and internal equity.
Newcomer vs Veteran Editors on Wikipedia: Participation Trends
Newcomer editors on Wikipedia are declining sharply, while veteran editors dominate contributions. This shift risks making Wikipedia less diverse and more biased. Can the platform open up to stay relevant?
Quality Control Tools Available to Wikipedia Editors
Wikipedia editors use simple, open tools like Citation Hunt, ORES, and Wikilink Detector to catch errors, fix broken links, and ensure content accuracy. These tools keep the world's largest encyclopedia reliable-and anyone can use them.
